How Well Does Your Architecture Accommodate Change?

Designing and maintaining a flexible architecture is the grail of the IT, application development and business triumvirate in a company. A flexible architecture allows:

  • Rapid addition of new, and extending existing application features.
  • Enhancing applications by including data from internal and external sources.
  • Exposing application data to a wider variety of devices and audiences.

With this flexibility, the business can pursue opportunities with minimal impact to baseline infrastructure.

The sad part: many architectures evolve (or mutate) over time, adding new, function-enhancing components to existing components as afterthoughts. In short, this is not an ideal scenario. The company may have achieved short-term business goals, but in an inflexible (and risk-ridden) way.

Without a flexible architecture, we see more than technical challenges: we see friction in company units:

  • IT and development can be seen as blockers, while the business is viewed as making unreasonable demands.
  • Time-to-market, and therefore, potential competitive advantage is lost.
  • Development cycles can be disrupted, adding significant expense to projects and products .

How do flexibility constraints manifest in the enterprise?

  • Physical and IT: not enough servers and / or not enough time / resources to deploy them.
  • Development of new features takes too long to code, or application / IT infrastructure won’t support enablement without changes to underlying components.
  • Access to internal and external data is restricted by policy, especially if business requirements require enhanced security levels in light of the modern online world.

If poorly-supported changes are implemented, success can become company’s worst enemy. Launching a product or feature atop an architecture that isn’t ready creates a new set of issues:

  • End user impact: users have a less-than-positive experience with your product.
  • Competitive risk: your great and game-changing ideas are exposed to the world before your application is ready for prime time.
  • Unanticipated downtime / impact on other systems: ‘bolt-on’ additions to an existing architecture can pose risks to the original components.

Avoiding issues and achieving success requires planning, execution and resources. The first two are wholly depending on an organization’s ability to complete IT and development projects. The last item is a hardware and resource issue that extending components into a solution that includes cloud computing (even if only on an interim basis) can help manage. Identifying your business goals and performing an inventory on your current state is an excellent place to start; a skilled architect can help you describe the future state and a migration path to your grail.

Advertisements

About Michael Coates
I am a pragmatic evangelist. The products, services and solutions I write about fulfill real-world expectations and use cases. I stay up-to-date on real products I use and review, and share my thoughts here. I apply the same lens when designing an architecture, product or when writing papers. I am always looking for ways that technology can create or enhance a business opportunity .. not just technology for technology's sake. My CV says: Seasoned technology executive, leveraging years of experience with enterprise and integration architectural patterns, executed with healthy doses of business acumen and pragmatism. That's me. My web site says: Technology innovations provide a myriad of opportunities for businesses. That said, having the "latest and greatest" for its own sake isn't always a recipe for success. Business successes gained through exploiting innovation relies on analysis of how the new features will enhance your business followed by effective implementation. Goals vary far and wide: streamlining operations, improving customer experience, extending brand, and many more. In all cases, you must identify and collect the metrics you can apply to measure your success. Analysis must be holistic and balanced: business and operational needs must be considered when capitalizing on a new technology asset or opportunity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: